Do the Poor Have More Meaningful Lives?
By Adam Alter
Some of the most rewarding life experiences are popular because they favor meaningful hardship over simple pleasure.
“He saved your life.”
“I didn’t eat it.”
“You didn’t eat it?”
“It was pork. I wouldn’t eat pork.”
“What do you mean why?”
“What, because it wasn’t kosher?”
“But not even to save your life?”
“If nothing matters, there’s nothing to save.”
Shigehiro Oishi, a University of Virginia psychologist who studies well-being, pointed to this passage when I e-mailed him last week to discuss a paper he wrote, with Ed Diener, a University of Illinois psychologist, which will soon be published in the journal Psychological Science. In the paper, Oishi and Diener found that people from wealthy countries were generally happier than people from poor countries. No surprise there. But they also found that people from poor countries tended to view their lives as more meaningful. Even Foer’s grandmother, impoverished and desperate, seems to have favored a meaningful, life-enriching religious tradition over immediate gratification.
Read the full article as published in The New Yorker.
Adam Alter is an Assistant Professor of Marketing with affiliated appointment in the Psychology Department.
More Opinions from Adam Alter
- "Do the Poor Have More Meaningful Lives?" 1.24.14
- "Does beauty drive economic success?" 12.19.13
- "How Culture Influences Our Financial Decisions, 12.10.13"
- "Why We're All So Impatient For Black Friday," 11.27.13
- "The Secret Science of Stock Symbols," 11.14.13
- "Why People Mistake Good Deals for Rip-offs," 10.21.13
- "Where We Are Shapes Who We Are," 6.14.13
- "Trade of the trick," 3.24.13
- "I See Red," 3.21.13
- "Global Warming: The Psychology of Ignoring a Superthreat," 11.21.12
- "You're Not Moving to Canada: The Psychology of Post-Election Melodrama," 11.7.12