FIN-02-006 |
NYU Stern School of Business |
February 2002
John A. Doukas and Prasad Padmanabhan
ABSTRACT
In this paper we examine the valuation effects and long-term performance of U.S. multinational firms involved in forced transfers of their foreign operating assets during the 1965-1988 period. The evidence suggests that the operational hedging ability of the firm to address country risk (nationalization threats) is related to the level of its intangible assets. While it is well known that firms with high levels of intangible assets prefer foreign direct investment, our results show that intangible assets have hidden properties of protection against country risk as well. We document significantly negative abnormal returns only for
divesting firms with low levels of intangible assets, but not for firms with high levels of intangible assets. In addition, we show that low (high) growth firms are involved in partial (complete) withdrawals, and show that the long-term economic performance of firms choosing the complete withdrawal strategy is better than those
that opt to remain. We argue that management's attempt to maintain economic links in a hostile foreign environment can be attributed in part to the firm's low growth opportunities, performance, and lack of contingent plans to address country risk.
John A. Doukas
Institution: Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University
Telephone: 212-998-0432
Fax: 212-995-4233
Email: jdoukas@stern.nyu.edu
Home Page: http://www.stern.nyu.edu/~jdoukas/
Prasad Padmanabhan
Institution: Finance Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182
To download a copy of this paper click here
To request a copy of this paper click here
|