Friday November 2, 12:46 PM
Deal in Microsoft antitrust case uncertain
A settlement in the antitrust case pitting the US Justice
Department against Microsoft hung in the balance amid reports that
18 states involved in the case wanted more time to review the
deal.
The parties were expected to present a deal to US District Court
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on Friday, and US Attorney General John
Ashcroft was slated to announce news of the settlement in a press
conference.
But the Wall Street Journal reported late Thursday that the 18
states that are co-plaintiffs in the government's case against the
software giant have asked for more time to consider the draft
settlement.
Their attorney would ask the judge for more time to file the
states' response, with a deadline expected sometime next week, the
report said, quoting a source familiar with the negotiations.
State officials could not be reached for comment on the report.
Kollar-Kotelly had set Friday as the deadline for mediated
talks.
Approval of the deal by the states is necessary for the case to
be resolved. If they refuse, the case, first launched in 1998, could
go back to court.
The Justice Department said late Thursday that Ashcroft would
hold a press conference at 10:00 am Friday (1500 GMT) on an
"antitrust matter", without giving further detail.
Published reports said Thursday that a tentative agreement would
not require Microsoft to disclose key technical data or redesign its
Windows software, but would give computer makers more power to
manage their desktop displays.
Government and company officials declined to comment on the
reports, but analysts said it could lift the cloud from over the
world's biggest software firm, giving a boost to both Microsoft and
the entire technology industry.
Nicholas Economides, an antitrust expert at New York University,
said the reports indicate "a good settlement because it deals with
the problems in the way that the court of appeals envisaged."
A US appeals court in June upheld a lower court finding that
Microsoft acted as an illegal monopoly but overturned an order that
the company should be broken up. The appellate judges also ordered
that a new judge be named.
On September 6, the US government abandoned its demand for a
breakup of the software titan, saying it was hoping to speed up a
resolution of the case.
Economides said the reports indicate that the settlement would
include "specific ways to ensure that Microsoft does not abuse its
monopoly position," reflecting the more limited scope of the appeals
court decision.
"The remedy has to be based on (the appeals court ruling)," he
added. "It should not punish Microsoft for things it was not found
guilty of."
Economides added that the settlement "would also have a good
effect on the rest of the industry by removing the uncertainty that
the antitrust case has created."
But some Microsoft critics said the settlement would be too soft
on Microsoft and called on the government to reject it.
Ken Wasch, president of the Software and Information Industry
Association, said the settlement "stunningly, will not change either
Microsoft's business practices nor its software implementations one
iota," and will rely on computer makers to offer diversity.
Robert Lande, a law professor at the University of Maryland,
said: "It looks like the DOJ has capitulated... it will be a
complete victory for Microsoft. Even if the states don't go along,
it's still a major, major victory for Microsoft."
Despite its antitrust woes, Microsoft launched the newest
incarnation of its Windows operating system, Windows XP, on October
25 in a splashy New York kickoff.
The stricken computer industry is hoping that XP -- with its
built-in capabilities to edit digital photos and videos, conduct
online meetings and play and record CDs -- will provide a spark to
ignite cooling sales.
More from > Tech News from
AFP
More from > Technology
|