The Challenges of the Fed’s Bid for Transparency
By Thomas Sargent, William R. Berkley Professor of Economics and Business & William Silber, Marcus Nadler Professor of Finance and Economics, and Director, L. Glucksman Institute for Research in Securities Markets
Public pressures – as well as confrontations with presidents and Congress – to avoid high interest rates have derailed the Fed’s best intentions throughout history.
The costs of this move will, however, outweigh the benefits unless the public understands how the Fed is likely to respond to unexpected economic developments, even as it tells everyone more about what it expects. By publishing interest rate expectations, the Fed aims to impair its future flexibility – but not too much. The benefit of self-restraint is to come from the greater clarity that businessmen and other private sector decision makers will have about future Fed actions. Too often in the past, the Fed and other central banks succumbed to political pressure to deviate from pre-announced commitments.
The problem is that while some deviations from an announced “path” of future interest rates might be unwarranted, others would be entirely appropriate as new information appears and events unfold. The Fed’s challenge is to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate responses, and to convince the market and other branches of government it will behave accordingly.
Read full article as published in the Financial Times.