London’s Uber ban is a message to a reckless tech ethos
— September 23, 2017
By Arun Sundararajan
It is a decision that hurts Londoners more than it protects them. However, convincing London that Uber is deserving of the public trust – in its appeal against the ruling – will be a critical test of whether its new leadership can navigate the company beyond the stormy waters weathered over the past few months. No stranger to regulatory strife, Uber’s approach to dealing with government has matured considerably since its early days of rampant permissionless innovation, but the backlash continues, especially in Europe. Uber was banned entirely in Denmark in April and some or all of its services have been suspended in Bulgaria, Hungary, France, Germany, Italy and Spain.
The London ban has greater potential for long-term damage. Regulators in other countries have generally opposed Uber because the transportation service it enables violates local (typically taxi licensing) laws. TfL’s objections are to the company itself. So, other companies may receive licences to offer Uber-like services in London, but Uber has been found “not fit and proper” to hold such a licence, a stunning indictment of the ride-hailing pioneer.
Read the original article as published in The Guardian.
Arun Sundararajan is a Professor of Information, Operations and Management Sciences, Robert L. & Dale Atkins Rosen Faculty Fellow, and Doctoral Coordinator of IOMS-Information Systems.